Religion is the adjustment with your environment or ecology.
It is very much geogrophical. That is why the different religon to different geogorophy.How we adjust with this ecology it is science.
this science develope by experience .
At the start it is called philosophy(ask to reason to any incident take place)but when we prove the things in practical way.
it is called Science.
-
- 2008-10-09 @ 16:55:51
-
- 2008-10-09 @ 17:02:09
i m asking that there are science behind the every religous thing or not.
-
- 2008-10-09 @ 17:21:42
Then no, absolutely none, nor can there be.
Tom.-
- 2008-10-09 @ 17:24:57
then give me such example i will give you region behind it.
-
- 2008-10-09 @ 17:43:31
There is some science behind religion - isn't there a part of the brain that makes people more susceptible to belief? I heard it's bigger in people that believe...
-
- 2008-10-11 @ 15:44:58
Religions were the first attempts to explain the world, mixed with social and moral codes. While one can argue about the validity of the social and moral codes to our days, the explanations of nature and universe have been superseded by centuries of new discoveries.
If you are interested in such matters, you may find my blog http://thequestionofreality.blog.co.uk/ interesting
-
- 2008-10-09 @ 17:07:37
There's a science behind the study of human behaviour (psychology & anthropology broadly speaking) and there's a science behind the study of religions and faith (theology).
Maybe it's a translation thing, but I'm finding it difficult to see what the question is. -
- 2008-10-09 @ 17:13:53
who control your life . are there any god(religious controller),or there are some rules of science.it is the question?
-
- http://bobmblack.blog.co.uk
- 2008-10-09 @ 17:16:05
Did I speak to you the other day in a call centre?
-
- 2008-10-09 @ 17:28:21
yeah you spoken to GOD to come another day in a call center
-
- 2008-10-11 @ 15:49:48
the pope just admitted that God was just an illusion. So who did you speak to?
-
- http://lostjohnnyparadox.blog.co.uk
- 2008-10-09 @ 18:01:59
There is and there is not!
One should need the other.
Science cannot prove or disprove the existence of soul or spirit or god.
Much of moderd science was borne from the philosophy of religion, i.e. Alchemy became chemistry.
This question has to be honest been beaten back an forward in this group, the rational empirical in their right of free will to say that under no circumstances is science and religion connected. The faithful to whatever religion will defend the right to their faith,(sometimes to the point of blind irrational).
Theosophy is the science of religion, although it is not of course empirical.
Religion is the exoteric face or faith.
Phiosophy is general problems concerning matters such as existence, knowledge, truth, beauty, justice, validity, mind, and languaguage by using reasoned arguements.
Science is an accepted method of understanding of how the universe works use observable physical evidence of natural phenomena to collect data, and analyze this information to explain what and how things work.
Theosophy is the science behind the history of philosophy and religion.
-
- 2008-10-09 @ 19:48:05
Theosophy is utterly unscientific, so to call it "the science of religion" is highly misleading.
And to answer metyu's point here, yes, there is some evidence that certain brain conditions are more common amongst believers. Further research into this would be worthwhile.
Tom.-
- 2008-10-11 @ 15:51:24
Theosophy is a religion like any other
-
- 2008-10-11 @ 16:37:09
Yup, and hence not scientific.
Tom.-
- 2008-10-12 @ 17:39:07
Can't argue. It seems that the word 'scientific' is often mixed with 'written in the books'
-
- http://www.IndayLet.blog.co.uk
- 2008-10-09 @ 20:51:49
(I am writing this with a child's smile)
How about the study about the "Art of Science" it might be a new vocabulary.
Sometimes, words grow ....
sometimes, people grow ....
And there are times that we have to grow!
Call it what you read it. -
- 2008-10-10 @ 01:02:02
Science is "knowledge" - Religion depends utterly on faith and the unknown. Therefore the two are not compatible.
-
- 2008-10-11 @ 09:12:14
I couldn't have put it better myself!

-
- 2008-10-11 @ 15:53:07
many have claimed, throught hisotry, that religion is knowledge. This has not changed much, for instance, intelligent design
-
- 2008-10-11 @ 22:35:52
Claiming something doesn't make it fact- religion cannot be knowledge as it relies inherently on faith. On the reciprocal action of behaviour. If you're bad, you'll be treated/judged accordingly. All this depends on such a deep belief as to not require proof. Whereas knowledge is acknowledged truth of action- an experiment happening before your eyes, figures from years of sophisticated calculation.
Religion stopped evolving centuries ago- science is on-going. Intelligent design is just the poor man's attempt at satisfying a thirst for proof and knowledge born from an age of fact in science and his need to believe that his own mortality isn't finite.-
- 2008-10-12 @ 17:51:06
politics, finance, marketing, the latest crisis and lots of new age claim that if you say something long enough, or if you believe it hard enough it becomes true.
So I suppose that you are not a supporter of any of the above?
-
- 2008-10-11 @ 09:15:04
practical to whom?
practical application to satisfy the mind and plant one-sided thoughts?????? hmmm.... -
- 2008-10-11 @ 18:07:31
i have read all of comments and there are onky one conclusion is that all of you calling religion is a faith but religion is also man made institution for the adjustment with ecology and this is basesd on scintific rules.Scintific rules is not man made it is observed only by human because only human can think.
whenever there run any discussion on god and science people used to talk about the faith . whst is this faith.-
- http://www.IndayLet.blog.co.uk
- 2008-10-12 @ 07:41:07
You made me smile again .... thank you for this thoughts.
Let me share you my thoughts about:
Faith is an Art of all thinking living things including humankind.
It is not only human who can think .... the animals too.
I think it is time for us humanbeings to learn back the old communication ways of all living things including humankind.
-
- 2008-10-12 @ 12:31:35
your humor is appreciable.
my next question is that are there any difference between animal and human.This difference is only in form but this form is also differ in the sense of thinking.There are not culture for animaal because they can not think in the way of human .the animal have not any religion.-
- http://www.IndayLet.blog.co.uk
- 2008-10-12 @ 12:50:58
.... and that is the reson why the animal kingdom has no war .... humanbeings are the one bringing war to them.
-
- 2009-09-14 @ 04:05:50
god is not Great by Christopher Hitchens. I suggest the read. I am only twenty years old and have accepted religion as a false front for something much bigger, for what I have yet to discover. It is not good, I know that much. I just read the paper ... at least 50 more dead in Afghanistan in just one day(stick to religion now, not the war), religion has separated many regions of the world and turned them against themselves. Tibetan prayer flags are considered divine and when they are replaced, villagers fight over them; the higher on the roof the holier they become. I will not send my children to sunday school, blue laws were passed 3 generations ago-let's give em up, and I WILL have sex even though I'm not married. Those who believe in hell deserve it.
SeasideMan
Pro


So, what are you asking?